Expect Climate Catastrophe: Paris Agreement Lacks Enforcement #auspol

By Andres Corr

Enforcement mechanisms for climate change targets are not being implemented, including in the Paris Agreement of December 2015. 

We are actually sliding backwards on this critical element of a global climate deal.
Sanctions were agreed in 2001, that any developed countries that missed emission limits between 2008 and 2012 would have even steeper limits in the future. 

That has since lapsed. 

In 2011, all countries agreed that a climate agreement should have “legal force.” Legal force requires an enforcement mechanism, which the Paris Agreement lacks. The E.U. pushed hard for binding targets in the Paris


Agreements, including international sanctions for noncompliance. Those did not come about. Bolivia called for an International Climate Justice Tribunal with the mandate to penalize countries for lack of compliance. There is no tribunal in the Paris Agreement.
Rather, most developed and emerging economies have systematically resisted international enforcement mechanisms. China (the world’s biggest emissions producer), Russia, the U.S., Canada, India, Japan, Australia, and major energy exporters, resisted the toughest climate change countermeasures over the years, including international monitoring and sanctions. Some in these countries have bemoaned the loss of sovereignty from transparency and enforceable international climate deals.

 As a result, the 2°C limit in the Paris Agreement on climate change, which started this month, is unenforceable and therefore solely an aspiration if the world can achieve carbon neutrality by 2100. The way things are going, that is unlikely. The Paris Agreement is now among over 500 similarly powerless global and regional environmental agreements.

President-elect Trump and other Republicans have dismissed global warming and the international coordination required to stop it.

 The countries most responsible for lagging in their pledges and policies since the Paris Agreement include Russia, Canada, Japan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. 


The U.S., China, India, Brazil, and E.U. countries also lag in their pledges and policies to achieve a climate-neutral future. Those countries that most opposed enforcement, unsurprisingly, also lag in their policy measures to achieve the Paris goals.

Given current pledges, temperature rise is predicted to be 2.8°C by 2100. But even these pledges to limit greenhouse gases have not been fulfilled. 

Factoring in current policies, rather than just aspirational pledges, temperature rise is predicted to be 3.6°C. So despite the political fanfare in Paris, the planet is likely headed for irreversible catastrophic climate change. 

 To bequeath a livable planet to our grandchildren, citizens must demand of their governments greater global transparency and enforcement measures against emissions.

Press link for more: Forbes.com

Advertisements

4 comments

  1. I never thought the human race would be so suicidal.

    Maybe I’m mistaken, but I was under the impression that in the past we eventually made changes that were detrimental to all life on the planet. Sometimes grudingly, but eventually the desire to survive proved enough. We allow pllenty of preventable death, disease and suffering, but extermination of all human and most animal life on the planet seems too much even for ignorant humans.

    I just don’t understand this current embracing of fear, hate, divisiveness and suicidal ignorance. It seems surreal…

    1. Me neither, I think it’s a lack of education, people just don’t understand the science. How could we leave our kids & all future generations sigh such a catastrophic mess?

      1. Corporate indoctrination is a main cause for this horrifyingly insane direction we’ve taken as a society, of course, but even that doesn’t seem to be enough to explain something so terrifyingly suicidal. The mindless desire for possessions has possessed too many of us.

  2. I made an error in my initial comment. I meant to say that “… in the past we eventually made changes *to past decisions* that were detrimental to all life on the planet.” Sorry about that. I must have been distracted. 🙂

    Thanks for your insightful and important posts.

Appreciate your comments John

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s