What’s a universal basic income doing in Ocasio-Cortez’s “#GreenNewDeal”? #auspol #qldpol #SystemChange not #ClimateChange #StopAdani #ClimateStrike #ExtinctionRebellion #TheDrum

By Dan Kopf

AP/Susan Walsh

Throwing the kitchen sink at climate change.

In 2007, the New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman wrote a story calling for a “Green New Deal.”

Friedman explained that he no longer believed that there was one silver-bullet program that would solve climate change.

Rather, just as a variety of programs were part of former US president Franklin Roosevelt’s “New Deal” for economic revitalization in the 1930s, so it would take a variety of investments in environmentally-friendly technologies to help stabilize the climate.

Friedman almost certainly could not have imagined that some day politicians would propose a Green New Deal that might include a universal basic income.

Newly elected US congress member and rising Democratic star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez campaigned for office on an ambitious climate-change platform which she also calls a Green New Deal.

The plan has gained attention and supporters over the last month, and is becoming a main talking point among Democrats who are looking for a meaningful agenda for the party over the next decade.

Ocasio-Cortez envisions the federal government leading efforts to eliminate greenhouse-gas emissions by investing in renewable energy infrastructure, improving the efficiency of residential and industrial buildings, and constructing an energy-efficient electricity grid.

Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal, however, involves taking on not only climate change, but also poverty and inequality.

To achieve the Green New Deal’s goals, the government would need to hire millions of people. Ocasio-Cortez sees this as an opportunity to transform the economy.

The Green New Deal would include training and education for workers, as well as a federal job-guarantee program.

Further, all investments would be focused on low-income communities.

Presenting climate-change mitigation as a jobs program, rather than an economy killer, may be politically savvy.

As if all that wasn’t ambitious enough, the Green New Deal would also include “basic income programs, universal healthcare programs and any others as the select committee may deem appropriate to promote economic security, labor-market flexibility, and entrepreneurism.”

It is basically everything liberals desire and more.

Supporters defend the need for these welfare programs as ways to alleviate the disruption that would be caused by the elimination of fossil fuel-supported jobs.

With a universal basic income and government-guaranteed health care, losing your oil-industry gig wouldn’t be as bad.

The program would of course be very expensive.

It’s hard to estimate how much it would cost, as the details are still murky. Green Party leader Jill Stein estimated that her version of the Green New Deal, which is less ambitious than the one presented by Ocasio-Cortez, would cost $700 billion to $1 trillion annually.

Ocasio-Cortez says hers would be funded by debt spending and tax increases.

In Friedman’s original conception, the government played a much smaller role in the Green New Deal.

He believed the government’s place was not in funding projects, but in seeding research and creating tax incentives and efficiency standards (paywall), and that harnessing the power of the private sector was the key to taking on climate change.

While Ocasio-Cortez believes the private sector has a role to play, she argues that the scale of the project is too big to leave to government-guided market forces.

The Green New Deal has come a long and very expensive way.

It still far cheaper than catastrophic climate change.

Press link for more: QZ.Com

3 comments

  1. For the USA, there is one glaring area where the money could come from, well two, actually. One, of course, pull out of those pointless wars and take the military down a few pegs, from 50% of government income to a more reasonable 10% strictly for homeland defense. Two, force the 1% to pay their fair share of taxes: problem of funding solved. If I can figure that out surely those in government and in business can figure it out too. Is “socialism” or equitable sharing of resources still a dirty word in America? Does being a socialist still mean ostracizing, labelled a communist, perhaps even lynched? One more question: is America capable of developing a social conscience in the very short time that remains for it to decide, life or death?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. “is America capable of developing a social conscience in the very short time that remains for it to decide, life or death?”
      Only if someone can make money out of it.
      Neo-liberalism will die with the collapse of America. And it will take down much of the western world with it.
      Coming soon to a store near you, the movie to end all movies, “Hey mama, the cashpoint’s stopped working….”

      Liked by 2 people

  2. On a more serious note, funding for any government level mobilisation and UBI can simply come from quantative easing. Instead of printing money and giving it to the banks and their corporate sponsers, as has happened since 2008, it can simply be printed and given to the people.
    No tax rises needed, other than on the polluters and on property portfolios over a £1 million.

    It is worth noting that (in the UK at least), only 3% of money is actual cash, 97% is merely a collection of electrons in multiple computers. So it would be easy to to re-allocate those electrons, add more or take some away. The only effort required being a few keyboard strokes and mouse clicks.

    The other way of reducing inequality is a random one-off debt amnesty, for everyone, from the homeless chap on the corner to the heads of the likes of Amazon and leaders of nations. At the same time you ban usury, as was done in previous times. At a legal pen stroke you then make wealth only generateable by work, rather than money being generated by owning money.

    This is of course all bunkum in one big sense, and the point any “Green Deal” misses. Until you abolish economy of all sorts, and start Degrowth, are you going to attempt to produce a real green deal that includes the biosphere that we rely on to exist.

    Liked by 1 person

Appreciate your comments John

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s