Carbon Capture & Sequestration

Theory of #ClimateChange—and Climate Wonder—for the Classroom #auspol #nswpol #StopAdani #EndCoal #SDGs #qldpol #RiseForClimate

Teachers are using “Project Drawdown” climate solutions in course curricula

Monday, August 27, 2018 – 04:00

Jonathan Hahn is the managing editor of Sierra, covering environmental justice and politics, global trade, energy, and public health. Follow him on Twitter @JonathanPHahn.

See more stories by this author

Last October, Katharine Wilkinson, the vice president of communication and engagement for Project Drawdown, addressed an auditorium full of eighth graders in Jackson, Mississippi. She was there to deliver a message that global warming is real, and that it can be solved.

Wilkinson presented slides that included a graphic illustration of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere for the last 400,000 years; the sudden upward trend of emissions in the last century was alarmingly undeniable. But she also ticked off the dozens of readily available solutions to reversing that trend.

A path, she argued, is right in front of us.

We only have to be willing to walk it.

At the end of her talk, the students handed in questions on index cards. Sorting through them, Wilkinson came across one she gets asked all too often at talks like these.

Is the planet doomed?

It’s exactly the kind of question she wants teachers around the country to take on with their students—in a way that gets them to ask a different question instead:

How do we solve it?

Wilkinson is part of a team of scholars, researchers, entrepreneurs, and environmental advocates who make up Project Drawdown, a nonprofit organization dedicated to developing realizable solutions to reversing, or “drawing down,” global warming and improving the national discourse around climate change science in general.

Last year, the organization released the best-selling book Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming (Penguin, 2017). Edited by environmentalist Paul Hawken, the book is easily one of the most ambitious compendiums of climate science ever published. Using peer-reviewed research gathered from climate experts, scientists, PhD researchers, and graduate students, Drawdown prescribes 100 decisive (and readily available) solutions to solving global warming—from refrigerant management (topping the list at #1) to everything from educating girls (#6) and afforestation (#15) to indigenous peoples’ land management (#39) and walkable cities (#54)—with a goal of reversing the trend line of carbon build-up in the atmosphere within 30 years.

Part of Drawdown’s theory of change is to demarcate the difference of priorities between climate mitigation and reversing global warming. Beyond presenting solutions for simply mitigating and adapting to climate impacts, the book offers solutions that “draw down” the causal factors that are leading to global warming in the first place.

Drawdown has become an inspiration to teachers and pedagogues looking to incorporate a solutions-based model of systems thinking to global warming in classroom curricula—an approach that moves past the problem-oriented thinking of Are we doomed?

“These are the questions students are asking as they hear media coverage, they hear conversations, they engage with these topics in the classroom,” Wilkinson said in a recent interview. “I think they intuitively get that articulating the problem statement over and over and over again is not a solution. It’s important that we understand it, but it doesn’t necessarily move us forward on its own.

“You also come to realize that students’ understanding of solutions, like most of us, is very limited,” Wilkinson said. “They usually think lightbulbs, solar panels, bicycles, recycling. What is really cool is to see them light up when they get how broad and diverse the landscapes of solutions is, and to have a sense of things that they can impact immediately, even as young people—things like food waste and a plant-rich diet.”

“What is emphasized in conversations about global warming is often the threat, the problem,” Paul Hawken told Sierra. “Inasmuch as that conversation often describes the mechanism of global warming—how the atmosphere works, how the atmosphere is created, the interaction between the atmosphere and living systems—that’s great, but it always devolves back on problem: threat, future, doom. Children need and deserve to be educated in a way that allows them to fall in love with the living world, with life—to discover it through the lens of awe and wonder, including the miracle of climate, as opposed to the disaster of climate.”

“Children need and deserve to be educated in a way that allows them to fall in love with the living world, with life—to discover it through the lens of awe and wonder, including the miracle of climate, as opposed to the disaster of climate.”

At the college and university level, teachers are engaging Drawdown with their students in different contexts and disciplines: in some cases, using it to address specific topics; in others, utilizing the book as an inspiration for students to creatively express themselves, with climate science as their muse.

Beth Osnes is an associate professor of theater at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and cofounder and codirector of Inside the Greenhouse, an endowed initiative dedicated to creative storytelling projects around climate change. She and cofounders Max Boykoff and Rebecca Safran wanted to find new ways to tell stories about climate science in a way that would make sense to their students, and help them evolve beyond simplistic ways of thinking about global warming solutions—such as recycling water bottles or changing your lightbulb.

“I decided to try to visualize Drawdown and these actions we can take in the context of a story and a location, and there are certain characters taking these actions,” Osnes says.

Osnes used Drawdown as a basis for creating a program she calls “Drawdown Act Up,” which tasks students with embodying Drawdown climate solutions through games, activities, and role-playing. The gambit of the program is to enact such notions as “refrigerant management” or “girls’ education” in a way that can catalyze one’s sense of possibility and problem-solving, and ward off climate despair.

Osnes designed “Drawdown Act Up” with an eye toward inspiring her students to break through some archaic ways of thinking about global warming.

“The thing that we encountered, even with seniors and environmental majors, is we would have them producing these creative compositions about climate, and they would be doing them about plastic water bottles,” she says. “We would tell them, ‘You guys, that’s not going to move the needle. Let’s really focus our efforts. You’re looking at the clock go tick tick tick.’ The work is more exciting if you’re working on top solutions.”

Students also produced comedy skits playing different characters in different locations, portraying characters such as refrigerator shoppers in the post–World War II 1940s, as a way of bringing Drawdown’s refrigerant management solutions to life.

“So everybody is having fun, but also they get it,” Osnes says. “The fact that it is youth-performed brings a whole other level.”

Osnes partnered with the National Park Service in July to lead a version of “Drawdown Act Up” at Rocky Mountain National Park for Discovery Day, focusing activities on the intersection between climate science and environmental stewardship.

College administrators are also increasingly relying on Drawdown as a guide. The Office of Sustainability at the University of Virginia used Drawdown to structure theories of student engagement around Earth Week. Similarly, the Office of Sustainability at Illinois’s Lake Forest College used Drawdown as a metric to audit what students are doing inside and outside the classroom to reverse global warming, and to examine the solutions they are advancing both academically and operationally.

“I think that there’s this weird silence around climate change,” Wilkinson said.” There’s polling that suggests the level of concern about climate is much higher than the frequency of discussion. A lot more people are worried than talk about it. So I think students and young people are really powerful voices for breaking that silence.”

To further expand Drawdown’s reach into the classroom, the organization is hosting Drawdown Learn this October with the Omega Center for Sustainable Living at the Omega Institute in Rhinebeck, New York. The three-day summit will feature educators, students, administrators, and community groups. Participants will workshop ways to implement Drawdown to advance learning and action beyond the classroom in order to advance an understanding of the solutions and also to begin to integrate them more fully, whether within school or a neighborhood.

To get students to engage with the solutions around global warming, Hawken emphasizes that they first need to come into their awe and astonishment of climate.

“We want to help students see climate science through a holistic framework,” he says. “That holistic framework involves emphasizing first what an extraordinary thing weather, climate, and atmosphere are—I mean, they are just extraordinary—and to get them to understand the mechanism of how the atmosphere is created to begin with. I think there is so much interest in Drawdown curricula from teachers all over because they need a way to teach about global warming that does not involve polemics.”

“The Drawdown solutions are no-regret solutions,” Hawken says. “They make for a better world. You are taking something that is not desirable, which is emissions, and you are reversing it and coming out with a better outcome for whatever you care about—whether you are a fisherman or a hunter, or a farmer, a business person, a teacher, a taxpayer, employed or unemployed.”

Wilkinson hopes students start changing their line of inquiry around global warming from Are we doomed? to How do we solve it? She wants them to move beyond the typical messages of threat and fear and us versus them that can often frame conversations around global warming and climate change science.

“If all we do is keep repeating the problem statement, then we may well be doomed,” Wilkinson said. “Humanity has been up to some amazing things in terms of solutions. We have a really incredible toolbox. The question is whether we will be the ones to make what is possible a reality. We have a path forward; we have to be the ones to walk it.”

Photos courtesy of Beth Osnes

Press link for more: Sierra Club

Learning From the Past to Bring the Paris Agreement Climate Goals Closer Within Reach #auspol #qldpol #nswpol #ClimateChange

By Mark Roelfsema

The Talanoa Dialogue in the UNFCCC [United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change] negotiations extends a broad invitation to share low-carbon stories on how to move from ‘where do want to go?’ to ‘how do we get there?’.

The aim is to ratchet up ambition in the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to bring them in line with the Paris Agreement (PA) climate goals.

One way of doing so is to look back at past low-carbon successes.

Although the required transformations of the energy and agriculture systems are challenging, governments and other actors have successfully started in various sectors.

What if other countries could learn from this and implement similar policies?

What if the success stories could be scaled up and replicated around the world?

Would that result in the necessary greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions?

Source: Quartz

In our article ‘Reducing global GHG emissions by replicating successful sector examples – the good practice policies scenario’, we show that replicating a selection of successful sector policies could halve the global emission reductions by 2030 that are required if we are to keep global temperature rise below 2 °C.

These sectoral policies cover about 65% of global emissions. By 2030, a scale-up of such policies would reduce emissions by around 10 GtCO2e, compared to currently implemented policies.

Examples of successful sectoral policies are the German feed-in tariff for renewable energy, the carbon tax in Norway to reduce flaring and venting, and the Action Plan for Deforestation in Brazil.

If the impact of such policies were to be achieved in all countries, global emissions by 2030 would be reduced by around 4 GtCO2e in the electricity sector, 1 GtCO2e in the oil and natural gas production sector, and 0.7 GtCO2e in the forestry sector, relative to the emission level expected to result from current policies (see Figure).

Figure 1: GHG emission levels (including LULUCF) as a result of implementing the selected nine good practice policies together. The emission levels are compared to global emissions resulting from the full implementation of the NDCs and a 2 C pathway.

A natural follow-up question(s) is that of whether and how countries could learn from each other and implement similar policies. On the one hand, country contexts matter. Culture, customs, institutions, policy settings and economic circumstances differ between countries. On the other hand, there are examples of policy learning and replication, such as the Chinese Emissions Trading System (ETS), which was set up after studying the implementation of the European Union (EU) trading system.

Literature on policy learning tells us that it is important to embrace the complexity of the policy landscape by a learning process of sufficient background information on policy context, success factors and differences between countries, as well as by experimentation. Again, the Chinese ETS is a good example, as it first experimented with provincial ETS, with slightly differing features, to see what would work best. Also, the currently developed Chinese ETS design proposes an output-based allowance allocation, mirroring the nature of China’s national policy targets.

What does this tell us about the ‘how do we get there?’ question of the Talanoa dialogue? In an atmosphere of trust, countries should be able to tell their stories of successful policy implementation, transparently share insights about sources of success and causes of failure, compare policy environments, and learn from each other. The resulting library of policies, contexts and success factors can be combined with the results from the UNFCCC technical expert meetings to ratchet up NDCs.

Such a process could be effectively supported by both social science insights into translating policies for various contexts, and quantitative modelling on policy impacts on greenhouse gas emission reductions. Further research could include more policies addressing other sectors, sub-sectors or sector activities, providing more opportunities for further reductions. At the same time, more research will also be needed to further improve realistic emission pathways, by addressing country-specific circumstances, accounting for implementation barriers and identifying important factors for policy learning.

Our main conclusion is that learning from other countries’ policies and implementing the related findings may bring the PA climate goals closer within reach.

The Talanoa Dialogue would be the perfect platform to make this happen.l

Mark Roelfsema is a Researcher in International Climate Policy at PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

Additional authors to the CPJ article: Hanna Fekete, Niklas Höhne,  Michel den Elzen, Nicklas Forsell, Takeshi Kuramochi, Heleen de Coninck, Detlef P. van Vuuren

Press link for more: Climate Strategies

Unprecedented Crime: Review #auspol #qldpol #nswpol #Drought #Bushfire #Heatwave #Flood #ClimateChange #StopAdani #NoNewCoal

This review was first published by Resilience.org on February 16, 2018.

The original article can be found here.

Cover image for Unprecedented Crime by Peter D. Carter & Elizabeth Woodworth | Clarity Press

Seldom are missed books truly missed opportunities — but nothing could possibly be worse than missing an opportunity that could have saved your life, and those of your family and friends.

Unprecedented Crime: Climate Science Denial And Game Changers For Survival is just such a book that you shouldn’t miss in this increasingly post-truth age.

With chapter-after-chapter gut punch, it is a volume that reads like a UN science team jointly making a life-and-death 911 call recording to a planet of primed and waiting emergency responders: “We’ve hit bottom.

The situation is dire.

Time is short.

Ignore the criminal deniers, bankers, media and politicians!

We need to urgently mobilize millions now!”

In a time when common sense human survival is really becoming uncommon with worsening existential threats in the White House and in our atmosphere and oceans with each passing hour, British Columbia writers Dr. Peter Carter and Elizabeth Woodworth, as honest brokers of factual scientific information, expose for readers the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of Big Oil glory days and their approaching end of days.

Dr. James Hansen (the former NASA scientist, pioneering climate-prophet) provides a Foreword that is sure to give you the first twists and turns between nightmares and hope to be found in the book.

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull

While arguably the most urgent issue of our time, climate change makes for a poor villain.

It is impersonal, and usually glacially slow.

However, there are uber-rich, faceless corporate villains lurking behind the rise in planet temperature who strive to ensure we all, in varying degrees, are part of the problem, by keeping the planet fossil-addicted.

Such corporate crime stirs the moral outrage of the authors like a legion of Nazis bent on similar world domination once stirred our grandparents.

Unprecedented Crime devotes the opening half of the book to deftly arguing that climate denial is not just immoral, that it is a willful act of global-scale violence, an unimaginably senseless and cruel act of climate battery against today’s vulnerable, and dispossessed, a fate which will surely only deepen and become dire for today’s youth and future generations.

It is a ‘policy breakout’ book deserving to be prominently placed on multiple library shelves from public health to climate adaptation to corporate criminology.

The writers chronicle how the billionaire-funded, but small denier community, has created an abrupt, near-death global experience, a life flashing before your eyes kind of thing, for the many facing record-shattering tornado swarms and hurricane force winds, to those barely escaping wildfire infernos with the clothes on their backs, and the palpably imaginable fear of others in flood-ravaged regions awaiting rescue from rooftops.

The trauma of denial was only less immediate but sadly gravely under-reported for drought-stricken subsistence farmers in many developing nations watching their crops shrivel and die during intense heatwaves, and poor fishers experiencing the slow asphyxiation of fish in warming oceans and disappearing lakes.

The fate of European climate refugees has become today’s fate of millions, human and non-human species seeking more and more migration to safe havens from deadly climate disruptions, habitat loss, and the conflicts which inevitably arise when resource scarcity becomes more acute on a hot planet.

While the definition of evil may change over time, as most governing parties anywhere in the world refuse to prohibit extraction of the oil and gas on their doorstep or fossil fuel imports due to the climate trivialization work of deniers and hydrocarbon-trafficking lobbyists, the authors ‘name and shame’ the deniers (and aiding and abetting bankers, media, shareholders and politicians) as among the evilest, downright dirty, and irredeemable corporate villains in the history of humanity.

Carter and Woodworth forcefully argue that it’s time for Big Oil ‘take-the-money and-run’ psychopaths to take full responsibility for the devastation they have wrought and to start paying for the unwise, unnecessary and unwanted global damage they have done and the moral confusion they have profitably cultivated.

Only a fool keeps on appealing to the better nature of a deaf thug, hence Carter and Woodsworth do not expect much more than the expected ongoing manufactured rage and lies of deniers, and the betrayal and treason of the political establishment, and reserve the remainder of their book to ‘game changers’ who have demonstrated the courage and prescience to pull the emergency brake on the runaway climate train, and offer additional solutions that can help democratize survival for the many.

To that end, these climate crimefighting authors controversially support the creativity, gumption and grit of greater civil unrest and civil disobedience necessary to get reticent world leaders and their citizenry to urgently respond to the Paris Climate Accord 1.5 C guardrail dying of Trump’s toxic political malabsorption, and Canada’s Trudeau threatening genocidal relapse into genteel apartheid for non-consenting indigenous communities confronting the tarsands and new pipelines.

Rest assured, history is not going to judge these leaders well.

Again, the real crime and legacy of unutterable shame is corporate and elected deniers suggesting indigenous and settler water protectors in our slowly decolonizing world commit a crime opposing new fossil fuel expansion (or the authors do by exposing planetary corporate ecocide and calling for concerted resistance, instead of rightfully receiving a civil courage award for their book).

Changing lifelong loyalties and habits is never easy, (especially if we’re still locked into a vexingly circular ‘glass half-full or half-empty of bitumen’ climate debate; as it turns out this shale bitumen barrel has no bottom) but is necessary if we want to have a habitable world for our gravely at-risk children and grandchildren.

Final takeaway for our ecologically ticking time bomb: If you’re feeling sadness or fury at the state of the world, the authors say put it to good use!

A no compromise, no retreat, no surrender, global climate mobilization is just what the doctor ordered.

This is not your first nor likely your final warning, but it is unerringly the most urgent in publication today — with very little time remaining.

Don’t wait for the final courtroom impact statements or climate collapse documentary.

Read the book before the climate denier bully mob have it banned and burned (but don’t be surprised, if half way through, it makes you want to go out and blow up a pipeline).

If read, the smart money is on you — making a difference that matters — a difference that won’t cultivate the denier lie that the climate emergency is a hoax (but hey, pro wrestling is real), and that there will always be someone else to save the world.

All readers of Unprecedented Crime should now consider yourselves ‘deputized’ to pursue by any means the lawlessness of carbon racketeers hiding in plain sight behind the autocratic corporate state.

If the law is to ensure human survival, everyday citizens must become the new vanguard pressing for a fundamentally just, democratic system change. Replacing complicity with conscience, together, we can again be both society’s sentinels and its tribunes.

Press link for more: MAHB.Stanford.edu

Lack of Political Leadership the other #Drought #auspol #qldpol #nswpol #ClimateChange #StopAdani

Lack of political leadership in the bush leaves the consumer the only driver of change

Jamie Brown

A lack of government leadership when it comes to water and vegetation management is restricting farmers’ abilities to survive drought, and for their pastures to recover when rains return, says an organic producer from Inverell.

Glenn Morris, Figtrees Organic Farms, Swanvale, rues the loss of government funded extension services, particularly the axing of catchment management authorities, that encouraged producers to manage water cycling through appropriate earthworks and tree planting.

Mr Morris grows organic pork and beef, marketing both products as a niche brand.

His farm system is modified to fit organic standards which means external inputs are reduced. So is production in a season like this but not as much as one would imagine.

“Billabong” concentrates on grass finishing and this year Mr Morris reduced his intake of weaners by 30 per cent in order to maintain ground cover.

“I could see it was going to be savage,” he says.

At the core of his enterprise is a holistic approach to soil, water and vegetation with an eye on the future as climate change becomes an accepted phenomenon.

Mr Morris began researching sustainable agriculture more than 20 years ago, before the subject was considered relevant. After graduating from agriculture college he completed a masters degree in sustainable agriculture focusing on water, humus, and carbon dioxide absorption.

He became a pioneer in the concept that carbon dioxide could be sequestered in soil and that such action could reduce, or at least stabilise, global warming.

Central to his approach is the on-farm production of humus, a remarkable gel-like substance, half carbon, that holds four times its weight in water.

At a soil depth of 30cm, for instance, just one percent humus will store 160,000 litres or 16mm worth of rain. In simple terms, the encouragement of humus production will help a paddock bounce back after drought.

Pastures allowed to decline to the point where soil biology is impacted will take so much longer to return to full production. Dollars already lost in the dry won’t return to the coffers until much further down the track.

RELATED READING:

Head to the bush and spend up for drought relief

Giving a concern at Brewarrina

In fact, elevated soil temperatures above 24 degrees result in  soil biology burning carbon and loss of that carbon back into the atmosphere.

“It is critical that we get the water cycle working again,” says Mr Morris.

Soil biology is the starting point, where microbes convert plant sugars to available nutrients.

“The reality is that there is more to pasture promotion than super and urea,” Mr Morris says.

“Hydroponic-grown pasture and crops using NPK seem to work well if you are getting rain. But this method does nothing to assist water cycling.

“Urea burns humus. Superphosphates stop the production of biology and mineralisation. Synthetic fertilisers are not helping,” he says. “ We’ve got to adopt ‘a do no harm to biology’ approach.

“The simple NPK method of farming has been encouraged by governments and universities for far too long.”

Mr Morris, grew up on the land at Goulburn before the great fires of 1964 wiped out the idea of succession. After a childhood in Sydney, extensive stock experience and university he landed a job managing a degraded farm at Grafton where he began to mend the broken water and mineral cycle through cell grazing.

“I had an intuitive understanding of the environment at that time and could see how rain would follow dry times and that it would simply run-off. Four to six weeks later we would be back in dry. The soil simply would not hold water.

Mr Morris began using techniques that mimicked the great grazing episodes of historic herds which entered high growth pastures and trampled the excess into the soil with their hooves, supplying soil-borne microbes with food which, in turn, returned nutrients back to the plants.

The consumer can make a difference in this arena, Mr Morris says. “They can support farmers doing the right thing.”

While change is coming, with more producers adopting a biological approach the pace is frustratingly slow for Mr Morris.

“This drought is impacting on carbon in the soil,” he says. “It is literally getting burnt out. And what are we doing at the political and university level between droughts to promote better management?

“We’ve got to change the conversation. We’ve got to start linking our actions with what is going on with climate change and improve the water cycle and agricultural abundance. This year for the first time in a while world grain supplies will not match demand because of droughts and heat waves.”

Mr Morris advocates a farm with half in perennial grassland, a quarter under forest – for water cycling – and the remainder under crop.

“It is critical that we don’t have country as bare ground,” he says. “However there is no leadership on this issue.

“At the federal level there is a climate information vacuum of truth and at the state level there is no action. Governments have stripped dollars out of rural Australia through cutbacks in catchment management programs and landcare.

“We are destroying the water cycle through widespread land clearing, particularly in Queensland. We need to start revegetation big time. Trees keep the landscape cool and mild which encourages local rainfall.

When Mr Morris purchased Billabong in 2006 he was caught by surprise by a lack of water, which didn’t fall from the sky until May 2007 and then quickly washed away. His pastures were degraded with poor ground cover, about 10 to 15 percent.

A lot of growing seasons since that time have been pitifully short, only fed only by remnant cyclonic weather from the north

Now, in the current drought, the property retains 100 percent ground cover.

RELATED READING:

A thousand hay bales headed for NSW from across Bass Strait

Declare drought a national disaster: Aussie Helpers

Mr Morris has modified existing contour banks which slowed erosion but tended to only concentrate water flow in gullies.

Construction of swell and swale, as advocated by William Albrecht, running parallel to the ridge line has stopped erosion, and with native trees planted on those swales, and double fenced to keep livestock out, the mounds of earth remain soft and absorbent. Rain now soaks into those mounds and disperses into the surrounding soil, rather than going down the creek.

Soil re-mineralisation is also helped by giving cattle dry lick in which nutrients like calcium are returned after they have done good in the rumen.

Holistic management through cell grazing has replicated natural grazing pressure, where the hooves of animals punch stubble from a body of feed back into the ground while feeding. And he cites work carried out by Allan Savory in this regard.

The message about food is increasingly cloudy these days, he says. Livestock is an important tool for carbon sequestration. Animal fats are good for us if they contain Omega 3, as they do in a pasture finished product where livestock have access to a diversity of plant species.

“I find it sad that the people who care most about the planet, vegans, are condemning livestock –  one of our greatest tools we’ve got to combat climate change,” he says.

“Currently 40 per cent of the world landscape is under pasture and in order for that area to stay healthy it needs to be managed. If we take animals out of the equation that 40 per cent will turn to desert through over cropping.

“You are wasting nothing when organic matter gets put back in the soil,” says Mr Morris. “The foundation to health and success is underground.”

Press link for more: The Land

The biggest culprit behind climate change may surprise you #auspol #qldpol

Food is the single largest direct and indirect driver of climate change.

Climate change is driving the expansion of agriculture into regions and habitats that never have been farmed before.

Clearing, burning, plowing and tilling natural habitats release enormous amounts of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, as do the cattle from methane and manure, other animals and the crops used to feed them. Overall, agriculture generates more emissions than all the airplanes, cars, ships and other vehicles combined — a total of 24 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions our societies emit.

Given these numbers, many organizations, including the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), are working to try to reduce greenhouse gas emissions via two key strategies: achieving conversion-free food production globally by 2030; and absolute reductions of GHG emissions from animal protein by 50 percent in the U.S. and 20 percent globally by 2030.

Take habitat loss out of the supply chain

To get there, our food businesses must take habitat loss and degradation out of their supply chains and make conservation and restoration a priority for their suppliers. These actions are not only imperative for the future of food, but they are also critical for companies’ future supply of raw materials, their operational and financial stability and their reputations.

Our food businesses must take habitat loss and degradation out of their supply chains and make conservation and restoration a priority for their suppliers.

The loss of habitat makes the land far less resilient. In conjunction with increasing temperatures locally, it is associated with declining productivity.

Recent (PDF) studies have shown that the Midwest and Great Plains of the U.S. may see an additional 20 to 30 days above 95 degrees Fahrenheit, each of which translates to a 2 percent decline in corn and soy production. Other studies have reached similar conclusions in the Cerrado region of Brazil.

A return to the Dust Bowl era?

Recent plowing of grasslands in the Great Plains is producing the same conditions that led to the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. In fact, photos posted on Facebook by a South Dakota state trooper April 30 suggest that dust bowl-like conditions are already occurring. When roots are gone, there is nothing to protect the soil. In these instances, ranchers can graze cattle in ways that enhance the grass and biodiversity.

In September, several thousand people from around the world — farmers and ranchers, business leaders, state and local elected officials, scientists, researchers, activists and more — will come together in San Francisco for the Global Climate Action Summit.

Taking place halfway between the 2015 Paris Agreement and the 2020 deadline to set new, more aggressive climate goals, the summit will show the world that, even as we make measurable progress in the effort to limit greenhouse gas emissions and global warming, it is not enough. We must all do more.

Land stewardship is one of the summit’s five focal areas. Under this banner, dozens of other environmental NGOs are challenging agriculture and other sectors to conserve natural habitats, restore degraded lands and implement climate-smart agriculture on working lands to sequester more carbon and make them more resilient.

Not just about agriculture

But the food sector is not the only industry that needs to get involved. Financial institutions can support restoration and support other incentives to de-risk the food sector. For example, in Paraguay, WWF is working with a global bank, a multinational restaurant chain and one of Paraguay’s leading meatpackers to create long-term contracts that allow ranchers to lock in market access for a decade.

In Paraguay, WWF is working with a global bank, a multinational restaurant chain and a leading meatpacker to create contracts that allow ranchers to lock in market access for a decade.

Long-term contracts are assets that farmers can use to borrow money to invest in improving their overall productivity and efficiency, while the buyer can use the long-term investment to ensure that the producers are deforestation-free, that they meet animal welfare requirements and that they make every good faith effort to double the intensity of production, sustainably, over the 10-year period.

Technology companies, too, can contribute to overall productivity and efficiency as well as land conservation and restoration. This is particularly true when it comes to transparency and monitoring. One of the biggest threats to even the most responsible companies is a lack of transparency in their supply chains. Responsible companies know where their products are produced, but they don’t know how they are produced.

Lack of transparency in supply chains

The paths that animal protein and feed crops travel from field to fork are often opaque, making it nearly impossible for buyers and consumers to know whether their food was produced responsibly or even legally.

Recent exposés have demonstrated the reputational risks that can arise when consumer-facing companies have deforestation in their supply chains. By combining satellite monitoring systems, distributed ledgers such as blockchain, and smartphone technologies, food companies can digitize transactions, link everyone in their supply chain and monitor production areas, practices and ostensibly protected habitats from space.

The good news is that we are already making progress. Hundreds of companies are implementing strategies to achieve deforestation and conversion-free production of beef, soy, palm oil and other products. Dozens more are turning their attention to critical grassland biomes. More than 60 companies, for example, have recognized the need to eliminate conversion in the Cerrado from their beef and soy supply chains. And in China, dozens of the country’s largest meat producers and importers have committed to eliminate products from their supply chains that are the result of converting native habitats.

Fostering collaboration

Three years ago, in Paris, nearly every country in the world committed to limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius compared to the pre-industrial average, ideally 1.5 degrees Celsius. We have not yet identified all of the actions necessary to get there, but where and how food is produced and how land stewardship is supported or encouraged can deliver a significant part of the solution.

Fostering collaboration between the food sector and finance, technology and scientific communities is the best way to make progress.

Press link for more: Green Biz

“Life Depends on Climate, Biodiversity Inextricable Link; Let’s Defend It” #auspol #qldpol #StopAdani #NoNewCoal #ClimateChange #Longman

Mountains of the Mộc Châu District, Vietnam

Credit: Unsplash/ Linh Pham

UN Climate Change News, 18 July 2018 –  Biodiversity and climate change are not separate issues, and if we are to protect the first one we must address the second, UN Climate Change Executive Secretary Patricia Espinosa said this week during the United Nations High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF) in New York.

The event – organised by the Secretariat of the UN Biodiversity Convention (CBD) – underscored opportunities that nature provides for human development and the global economy.

Recalling that it was in Rio at the 1992 Earth Summit that the CBD was open for signature along with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Convention to Combat Desertification, Ms Espinosa said:

“1992 was an important year for our planet’s long-term health. Since then, our organizations have been intricately tied with respect to our overall direction and vision. […] Ours is a long-term vision of the future; one that considers the health of the planet, all forms of life, and the sustainable use of its resources.”

Conserving natural terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems and restoring degraded ecosystems is essential for the overall goals of both the UNFCCC and the Convention on Biological Diversity because ecosystems play a key role in the global carbon cycle and in adapting to climate change, while also providing a wide range of ecosystem services that are essential for human well-being.

“If we are to protect our biodiversity, we must address climate change. But to address climate change, we must protect our biodiversity.

It’s the same with respect to desertification.

They’re not separate issues—they’re one and the same.

They’re threat multipliers, and tied to some of humanity’s biggest challenges,” said Ms Espinosa.

She further discussed how the Paris Climate Change Agreement and the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are dependent on the health and vitality of the Earth’s natural environment in all its diversity and complexity, and talked about how the need for long-term, sustainable solutions link the climate change and biodiversity agendas.

“There is an urgent need for a ‘Global Deal for Biodiversity’ and for a game-changer in the way humans engage with nature, in order to achieve the objective of living in harmony with nature by 2050,” said the CBD Executive Secretary, Cristiana Paşca Palmer, who hosted the event.

During the roundtable discussions, participants shed light on how political leadership, drive and inclusiveness can bend the curve on biodiversity loss, and drive new orientations towards the opportunities that nature provide to local, national and global well-being. Participants also presented solutions and innovations to tackle the identified problems related to biodiversity and talked about how concrete actions should be taken to address the problems.

1992 was an important year for our planet’s long-term health.

It was the year of the Rio Earth Summit, where the UNFCCC, the UN Biodiversity Convention and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification were opened for signature.

Since then, our organizations have been intricately tied with respect to our overall direction and vision.

We work to achieve results that have an impact today and to ensure our societies are sustainable and resilient over the long term.

That last part is a significant challenge.

Since the dawn of civilization, humanity has capitalized on its unique capacity for communication and ingenuity, resulting in explosive bursts of output.

We’ve gone from hunter-gatherers to large-scale farmers and industrialists in the blink of an eye.

And, in the transition from the Industrial Revolution to the Information Age, we’ve pressed the accelerator even harder.

We’ve never gone further or faster, but we’ve rarely looked in the rearview mirror to see what we’ve left behind.

While the results have always been closer than they appeared, they’re blindingly obvious now.

We see it in the degradation of our natural environment.

We see it in the extinction of plants, in our fished-out oceans, and the reduction of our biodiversity.

This last point is vital!

Because we know that biodiversity is about more than just one species—it’s about life itself.

We are all connected, and we all depend on this one planet.

But to depend on it means we must also defend it.

We also see the residual effects of our accelerated ambition in the amount of carbon dioxide in the air and its effects upon our climate.

We continue to pass warning signs, and they’re getting larger and larger.

Superstorm Sandy hit here in 2012, inflicting more than $70 billion in damages. It also resulted in 147 deaths in the Northeast United States, Canada, and the Caribbean.

48 of those deaths were here in New York.

2017 was also a year of warning signs.

It was nothing less than a climate disaster with hurricanes and flooding devastating many cities, villages and the entire country of Barbuda.

Other regions experience extreme drought or wildfires. Still others deal with rapidly-changing weather patterns that affect everything; from the flora and fauna that has always grown there, to the lives of those who call those places home.

It’s unacceptable. How much more evidence do we need before we realize that short-term thinking is hazardous to the long-term health of humanity?

I believe our organizations reflect a better and more comprehensive approach. Ours is a long-term vision of the future; one that considers the health of the planet, all forms of life, and the sustainable use of its resources.

We have several instruments leading us forward, including the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement. By combining our efforts and working together even more in the future, we can strengthen our ability to achieve their objectives.

Our goals, after all, are one and the same. If we are to protect our biodiversity, we must address climate change. But to address climate change, we must protect our biodiversity. It’s the same with respect to desertification.

They’re not separate issues—they’re one and the same.

They’re threat multipliers, and tied to some of humanity’s biggest challenges.

I recently had the opportunity to speak at the Environment and waters Leaders Forum in Singapore, and I explained how this relationship works with respect to clean water.

Global warming is the origin of more frequent droughts and floods, hurricanes, and extreme weather events related to water.

And this puts pressure on everything: food, energy and, yes, clean water. This struggle for resources, in turn, worsens social, economic and environmental pressures. This can lead to displacement, social upheaval and violent conflict.

That’s why, when we consider any finite resource such as water, we must consider the impact of climate change.

But to ensure there is an adequate supply of these resources in the future, and to ensure we protect the biodiversity of our planet, we must take climate action now.

I’m optimistic we can do it. But we can’t do it alone. We need your help, especially with respect to the work we need to achieve with respect to the Paris Agreement at COP24.

While the Agreement is one of the most successful multilateral agreements of modern times, it requires guidelines for its implementation.

By the end of this year, and certainly by COP24 in Poland this December, we must achieve three goals.

First, we must complete the implementation manual of the Agreement itself—also known as the Paris Agreement Work Program.

Second, nations must significantly accelerate global climate ambition before 2020.

And third, that ambition must be reflected in the next round of Nationally-Determined Contributions.

Why is this important? Because current contributions will not reach our goal of limiting global temperature rise to, ideally, 1.5-degrees Celsius.

We need more climate action, more climate ambition, and we need countries to understand that time is running out.

We are not only ignoring the warning signs on the road ahead, we’re running out of road.

You have the power to influence to help us achieve these goals.

We encourage you to work with your national leaders and let them know they need to increase their climate ambition and fulfil the Paris Agreement.

We also need you to continue talking about why biodiversity is important. Use your examples, your stories, your evidence. We will also share this information. We encourage you to also make the link to climate change.

Ladies and gentlemen, we value the relationship we currently have. Let us continue to work together to achieve even more.

As I’ve outlined today, our organizations are intricately linked and have been since their inception.

We have accomplished much, but our future work is critical.

Let’s work to stop the cycle of generations leaving a legacy of neglect. Let ours be the one to stop it. Let us instead build an inheritance that is worthy of passing down.

And that means building something better: a planet that is cleaner, greener and more prosperous for all.

Thank you.

Press link for more: UNFCCC

The big heatwave: from Algeria to the Arctic. But what’s the cause? #auspol #qldpol #StopAdani #NoNewCoal #ClimateChange #Longman

The big heatwave: from Algeria to the Arctic. But what’s the cause?

Robin McKieSun 22 Jul 2018 08.00 BST

Last week, authorities in Sweden took an unusual step.

They issued an appeal for international aid to help them tackle an epidemic of wildfires that has spread across the nation over the past few days.

After months without rain, followed by weeks of soaring temperatures, the nation’s forests had become tinderboxes.

The result was inevitable. Wildfires broke out and, by the end of last week, more than 50 forest blazes – a dozen inside the Arctic circle – had spread across Sweden.

A nation famous for its cold and snow found itself unable to cope with the conflagrations taking place within its border and so made its appeal for international help, a request that has already been answered by Norway and Italy who have both sent airborne firefighting teams to help battle Sweden’s blazes.

Nor is the nation’s fiery fate particularly unusual at present. Across much of the northern hemisphere, intense and prolonged heatwaves have triggered disruption and devastation as North America, the Arctic, northern Europe and Africa have sweltered in record-breaking temperatures. In Africa, a weather station at Ouargla, Algeria, in the Sahara desert, recorded a temperature of 51.3C, the highest reliable temperature ever recorded in Africa.

In Japan, where temperatures have reached more than 40C, people were last week urged to take precautions after the death toll reached 30 with thousands more having sought hospital treatment for heat-related conditions. And in California increased use of air conditioning units, switched on to counter the scorching conditions there, has led to power shortages.

But perhaps the strangest impact of the intense heat has been felt in Canada. It too has been gripped by ferocious heat, with Toronto recording temperatures that have exceeded 30C on 18 days so far this year. This figure compares with only nine such days all last summer.

Dozens have died in the withering heat – with startling and grim consequences. Montreal’s morgue has been swamped with the bodies of those who have died because of the heat, and many corpses have had to be stored elsewhere in the city. Montreal coroner Jean Brochu said it was first time the city’s morgue had been overwhelmed this way.

Britain’s scorching weather – which has melted the roof of Glasgow’s Science Centre and parched the lawns of the nation’s historic homes – may have made regular UK headlines. However, it has been relatively mild in impact compared to those experienced in many other parts of the world.

Fighting wildfires near Brasilia, Brazil, last week. Photograph: Ueslei Marcelino/Reuters

Far from being a parochial problem, the current heatwave is clearly an issue that affects vast stretches of our planet: a global concern not a local one.

But why is so much of our world currently being afflicted with blisteringly hot weather? What is driving the wildfires, the soaring temperatures and those melting rooftops? These are tricky questions to answer, such is the complex nature of the planet’s weather systems. Most scientists point to a number of factors with global warming being the most obvious candidate. Others warn that it would be wrong to overstate its role in the current heatwaves, however.

“Yes, it is hard not to believe that climate change has to be playing a part in what is going on round the globe at present,” said Dann Mitchell of Bristol University. “There have been some remarkable extremes recorded in the past few weeks, after all. However, we should take care about overstating climate change’s influence for it is equally clear there are also other influences at work.”

One of those other factors is the jet stream – a core of strong winds around five to seven miles above the Earth’s surface that blow from west to east and which steer weather around the globe. Sometimes, when they are intense, they bring storms. On other occasions, when they are weak, they bring very calm and settled days. And that is what is occurring at present.

“The jet stream we are currently experiencing is extremely weak and, as a result, areas of atmospheric high pressure are lingering for long periods over the same place,” added Mitchell.

Other factors involved in creating the meteorological conditions that have brought such heat to the northern hemisphere include substantial changes to sea surface temperatures in the North Atlantic. “These are part of a phenomenon known as the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation,” said Professor Adam Scaife, of the Met Office.

“In fact, the situation is very like the one we had in 1976, when we had similar ocean temperatures in the Atlantic and an unchanging jet stream that left great areas of high pressure over many areas for long periods,” said Scaife.

“And of course, that year we had one of the driest, sunniest and warmest summers in the UK in the 20th century.”

Farmers are battling an extreme drought in New South Wales, Australia.

Photograph: Brook Mitchell/Getty Images

However, there is one crucial difference between 1976 and today, added Professor Tim Osborn, director of research at the Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia. “The baseline on which these effects operated is very different today. Since 1976 we have had several decades of global warming – caused by rising carbon emissions – which has raised baseline global temperatures significantly.”

As a result, any phenomenon such as the weakening of the jet stream is going to have a more pronounced effect than it did 40 years ago.

And as global carbon emissions continue to rise and predictions suggest the world will be unable to hold global temperature rises this century to below 2C above pre-industrial levels, widespread heatwaves are very likely to get worse and become more frequent, scientists warn.

Nor is the problem of increasingly severe heatwaves confined to the land. “We have marine heatwaves as well – all over the globe,” said Michael Burrows, of the Scottish Marine Institute, Oban. “For example, there was a major marine heatwave that struck the coast of Australia last year. It devastated vast swathes of the Great Barrier Reef. More to the point, marine heatwaves are also becoming more and more frequent and intense, like those on land, and that is something else that we should be very worried about.”

A simulation of maximum temperatures on 21 July. Photograph: Climate Reanalyzer/Climate Change Institute/University of Maine

Press link for more: The Guardian

Major polluters spend 10 times as much on climate lobbying as green groups #auspol #qldpol #ClimateChange #StopAdani #NoNewCoal

Fossil fuel companies are some of the most significant lobby groups in the US for climate change-related issues ( Getty Images )

Major polluters have had a massively disproportionate financial influence on US politics in recent years, according to a new analysis of climate lobbying.

Over the past two decades lobby groups have spent more than $2bn (£1.55bn) in attempts to influence climate change legislation in the US.

The vast majority of this money has come from groups that stand to lose out from limits on carbon emissions, such as the electrical utilities sector, fossil fuel companies and transportation.

This spending dwarfed that of environmental organisations and the renewable energy sector, which overall contributed around a tenth of the funds given by sectors with significant greenhouse gas emissions.

“The vast majority of climate lobbying expenditure came from sectors that would be highly impacted by climate legislation,” explained Dr Robert Brulle of Drexel University, who conducted the analysis.

An environmental sociologist by background, Dr Brulle conducted his study using mandatory lobbying reports made available on the website OpenSecrets.

“The spending of environmental groups and the renewable energy sector was eclipsed by the spending of the electrical utilities, fossil fuel and transportation sectors,” he said.

Dr Brulle looked at spending information for related issues between 2000 and 2016, a period in which climate change was a crucial issue in national politics.

The electrical utilities sector spent the most on climate change lobbying during this stretch – over $500m and a quarter of all overall spending.

This was followed closely by the fossil fuel sector at $370m and the transportation sector at around $250m.

The efforts of environmental groups and the renewable energy sector paled in comparison to these figures, accounting for just 3 per cent of overall funding each.

Overall, this meant sectors relying on fossil fuels spent ten times as much as green interests did during this 16-year period. These findings were published in the journal Climatic Change.

“Lobbying is conducted away from the public eye. There is no open debate or refutation of viewpoints offered by professional lobbyists meeting in private with government officials,” said Dr Brulle.

“Control over the nature and flow of information to government decision-makers can be significantly altered by the lobbying process and creates a situation of systematically distorted communication.

“This process may limit the communication of accurate scientific information in the decision-making process.”

Dr Brulle said that as lobbying by environmental groups often constitutes short-term efforts, it cannot compete with the considerable firepower employed by professional lobbyists. He said his findings have considerable implications for the future of climate legislation in the US.

Press link for more: Independent.Co

Higher ambition needed to meet Paris Targets #auspol #qldpol #ClimateChange #Divest @ElliottShayne CEO @ANZ_AU #NoNewCoal #StopAdani #CoralnotCoal

Higher ambition needed to meet Paris climate targets

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE

With current climate policies and efforts to increase clean power generation, the remaining use of fossil fuels in industry, transport and heating in buildings will cause enough CO2 emissions to push climate targets out of reach, according to a study co-authored and co-designed by the JRC.

Accelerated energy efficiency improvements and a widespread electrification of energy demand are needed.

Otherwise, the world will become increasingly dependent on carbon dioxide removal to hold warming to well below 2°C, and the 1.5°C target for this century is likely to be unachievable.

A team of scientists from across the world set out to identify bottlenecks towards achieving the internationally agreed Paris climate targets.

They found that even with very strong efforts by all countries, including early and substantial strengthening of the intended nationally determined contributions, residual carbon emissions will reach around 1000 gigatons of CO2 by the end of the century.

This goes considerably beyond the level that emissions must be limited to in order to achieve the 1.5°C target.

Carbon dioxide removal is therefore no longer a choice, but a necessity for limiting warming to 1.5°C.

None of the scenarios the scientists modelled were able to achieve this target without the availability of a negative emissions technology, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage technology.

The researchers also found that a failure to ramp up mitigation efforts now will increase the dependence on carbon dioxide removal as it locks in even more investments in infrastructures and leaves the world unprepared to make the changes needed to decarbonise.

The research has been published in Nature Climate Change.

Integrated Assessment Modelling

To assess options for emissions reduction, the scientists used 7 state-of-the-art modelling frameworks, which take into account temperature targets as well as the economic costs and technological options.

This included the JRC’s POLES global energy model. JRC scientists also contributed to the design of the research scenarios and the processing and interpretation of the results.

The study was conducted as part of the ADVANCE project, a central aim of which is to evaluate and improve the suitability of models for climate policy impact assessments.

The POLES model covers the entire energy balance, from final energy demand, transformation and power production to primary supply and trade of energy commodities across countries and regions.

It enables scientists to assess climate and energy policies, as well as future energy needs.

Related studies, recently co-authored by JRC scientists include:

The first multi-model analysis of mitigation efforts in the short term (to 2030) and their effectiveness in 2?°C and 1.5?°C climate stabilisation scenarios. The report confirms the importance of energy efficiency improvements and efforts for a zero carbon energy supply; An assessment published in Nature Energy which confirms that considerably up-scaled investment will be needed globally to realise the energy system transformation required to fulfil the Paris Agreement and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

Background

These studies contribute to a growing body of scientific insights on the actions needed to achieve the Paris climate targets.

They strengthen the evidence behind climate initiatives which aim to strengthen global commitments to reaching these targets, including the major milestones to be reached by 2020 and the EU’s mid-century strategy for moving to a competitive low carbon economy by 2050, proposals for which are expected in November this year.

Following the 23rd Conference of the Parties (COP23) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Talanoa Dialogue for climate ambition, constructive, facilitative and solutions oriented approach was launched.

The studies also provide timely evidence ahead of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, which will serve as an input to the Dialogue.

###

Press link for more: Eureka Alert

Gorgon gas plant could wipe out a year’s worth of Australia’s solar emissions savings #auspol #qldpol #climatechange #LNG #StopAdani

How the Gorgon gas plant could wipe out a year’s worth of Australia’s solar emissions savings

By Kathryn Diss

Photo: Australia’s LNG production has jumped in recent years. (Reuters)

The combined greenhouse gas emissions saved by all of Australia’s solar panels in a year could be wiped out because of technical problems at a single oil and gas project in Western Australia.

It is just one example of a broader problem facing the nation as it tackles the massive challenge of meeting its Paris Agreement commitment to reduce 2005 emissions by 26-28 per cent by 2030.

Chevron began operating its $US54 billion ($73 billion) Gorgon gas plant in the state’s north-west in 2016.

Part of its environmental agreement was to capture and store underground 40 per cent of the plant’s emissions through a sophisticated process known as geosequestration or carbon capture and storage.

This involves capturing carbon dioxide (CO2), typically produced by large industrial plants, before it enters the atmosphere.

It is then compressed and injected deep into rock formations for permanent storage.

Video: The Gorgon carbon capture process explained (ABC News)

Chevron predicted that process would have seen between 5.5 and 8 million tonnes of CO2 injected into the ground during the plant’s first two years of production from the Gorgon field, making it one of the largest carbon abatement activities in the world.

Instead, technical problems with seals and corrosion issues in the infrastructure have delayed CO2 storage and the Federal Government, which contributed $60 million towards the green technology, is not expecting the problem to be rectified until March 2019 — about two years after production began from the Gorgon gas field.

By that point, experts including energy consultancy firm Energetics predict the additional CO2 emitted into the atmosphere will be roughly equivalent to the 6.2 million tonnes in emissions saved in a year by all the solar panels in the country combined — from small household rooftop systems to major commercial installations.

In the meantime, all those emissions supposed to be injected underground are being vented into the atmosphere.

Solar power gains wiped out

Almost 2 million Australian households have installed solar panels to cut their power bills while also doing their bit for the environment. Households account for most of the country’s total solar panel emission savings.

Embed: Datawrapper – Growth in solar installations

“The volume of pollution coming out of the Chevron project far outweighs the savings of carbon pollution from rooftop solar,” Climate Analytics chief executive Bill Hare said.

Dr Hare, a physicist and climate scientist of 30 years, founded Berlin-based research organisation Climate Analytics and has helped negotiate several international climate policies, including the Paris Agreement in 2015.

“Many people have proudly put solar panels on their roofs, not just to save on their power bills but to do something for the climate,” he said.

Embed: Datawrapper – Australians avoiding more carbon emissions

“I think that was a big promise, there’s a fair bit of public funding which has gone into supporting the company in developing this technology and deploying it.”

Chevron declined to comment on the comparison but reiterated it was committed to safe commissioning of the storage plant to achieve high injection rates over the life of the project.

“Our focus is on the safe commissioning and start-up of the carbon dioxide injection project and achieving a high percentage of injection over the 40-year life of the Gorgon project,” a company spokeswoman said.

“We have been keeping the relevant government agencies informed as to the progress of the commissioning of the Gorgon carbon dioxide injection project.”

Failure could cost Chevron tens of millions

Western Australia’s Environment Minister, Stephen Dawson, has ordered the state’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to investigate the delay and determine whether the company can meet the key condition that at least 80 per cent of CO2 extracted from the project’s gas reservoirs is captured over a five-year rolling average.

“There’s different views between … government and industry about when it should start,” Mr Dawson said.

“So what I’ve sought from the EPA is for them to reassess the issue and give me some definitive advice about when the start date was so we can make sure that (the) proponent is doing what they’re supposed to do.”

But industry watchers believe the target is now unachievable.

“At the end of the first five years it will have failed the environmental conditions on the project”, said Simon Holmes a Court, senior adviser at the Energy Transition Hub at Melbourne University.

“Given they’re already a year behind and likely to be two years behind, at best they will be sequestering 60 per cent. So as things stand Chevron is already planning to be breach of the ministerial statement.”

Photo: Chevron’s Gorgon gas project on Barrow Island. Date unknown. (Supplied: Chevron)

If the company doesn’t meet the requirement it is meant to find alternative offsets, but experts are worried the goalposts will be moved.

Climate change consultant Greg Bourne, the former energy adviser to British prime minister Margaret Thatcher and regional president for BP Australasia, warned governments against backing off.

“These sorts of issues can set very, very dangerous precedents,” he said.

“They should be required to purchase [carbon] offsets equivalent to the same volume they were expected to inject over the first five-year period.

“Now that’s going to be expensive, but why would they be allowed to get off scot-free?”

If put in monetary terms, offsetting that much CO2 would costs tens of millions of dollars a year in carbon credits.

A review is also underway into the emissions conditions placed on Chevron’s other major north-west WA project — Wheatstone.

Conditions imposed on that project by the WA Government were waived by the previous government of Colin Barnett when the Clean Energy Act came into effect in 2011.

But given the Act was later repealed, the WA Government is re-examining if the company should be offsetting more of its greenhouse gases.

While no other major oil and gas company operating in Australia has tackled such a complex project like carbon capture and storage, other players in the market such as Woodside, INPEX and ConocoPhillips are reducing emissions from various projects with locally generated offsets.

Press link for more: ABC.NET.AU